Taming of the Shrew was the more enjoyable comedy of the two for me because of the humor in it. Overall comedy hasn't changed all that much. In A Midsummer Night's Dream there are still the fools, the idiots, that are placed there for quick comic relief; the three stooges are a more modern version of Bottom and his band of "actors". Although this sort of comedy works for a majority of people, I'm more a fan of subdued intelligent humor. To me, Taming of the Shrew is the more witty and funny play of the two we read, but that's solely personal opinion. I like the dialogue between Kate and Petruccio, and the latter just astounds me in how far he's willing to go to subdue Kate.
I also like Kate's character and the way Shakespeare makes her see her own personal flaws. People are initially intimidated of her; she is quicker than most of Padua. However it takes Petruccio, a man that isn't afraid to stand up to her, to make her see herself from a different perspective. The fact that he beats her at her own game is comedic.
I didn't like the conclusion of the play in that Kate basically concedes to Petruccio and is "tamed". Her character, an independent woman, was out of the norm in Shakespeare's day. I think that she did just become part of the crowd at the end, and although that was the point of the play, I was a little disappointed in her.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment